lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170329085033.f5dde9a9d338bf6e645ee5cb@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:50:33 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
Cc:     Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Iago López Galeiras <iago@...volk.io>,
        Michael Schubert <michael@...volk.io>,
        "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tracing/kprobes: expose maxactive for kretprobe in
 kprobe_events

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:08:16 +0200
Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io> wrote:

> Thanks for the review,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:52:22 +0200
> > Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When a kretprobe is installed on a kernel function, there is a maximum
> >> limit of how many calls in parallel it can catch (aka "maxactive"). A
> >> kernel module could call register_kretprobe() and initialize maxactive
> >> (see example in samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c).
> >>
> >> But that is not exposed to userspace and it is currently not possible to
> >> choose maxactive when writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> >
> > I see, I found same issue last week...
> >
> >>
> >> The default maxactive can be as low as 1 on single-core with a
> >> non-preemptive kernel. This is too low and we need to increase it not
> >> only for recursive functions, but for functions that sleep or resched.
> >>
> >> This patch updates the format of the command that can be written to
> >> kprobe_events so that maxactive can be optionally specified.
> >
> > Good! this is completely same what I'm planning to add.
> >
> >>
> >> I need this for a bpf program attached to the kretprobe of
> >> inet_csk_accept, which can sleep for a long time.
> >
> > I'm also preparing another patch for using kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) in
> > kretprobe_pre_handler(), since this manual way is sometimes hard to
> > estimate how many instances needed. Anyway, since that may involve
> > unwilling memory allocation, this patch also needed.
> 
> Where is that kretprobe_pre_handler()? I don't see any allocations in
> pre_handler_kretprobe().

pre_handler_kretprobe(), I'll send my patch, but note that I also considered
to introduce a patch which exactly same as yours. So even with my patch,
this patch should be introduced.

> 
> >> BugLink: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/1072
> >
> > Could you also add Lukasz to Cc list, since he had reported an issue
> > related this one.
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-trace/msg00448.html
> >
> > Please see my comments below.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt |  4 +++-
> >>  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c         | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> index 41ef9d8..655ca7e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ current_tracer. Instead of that, add probe points via
> >>  Synopsis of kprobe_events
> >>  -------------------------
> >>    p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS]       : Set a probe
> >> -  r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]          : Set a return probe
> >> +  r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]       : Set a return probe
> >>    -:[GRP/]EVENT                                              : Clear a probe
> >>
> >>   GRP         : Group name. If omitted, use "kprobes" for it.
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ Synopsis of kprobe_events
> >>   MOD         : Module name which has given SYM.
> >>   SYM[+offs]  : Symbol+offset where the probe is inserted.
> >>   MEMADDR     : Address where the probe is inserted.
> >> + MAXACTIVE   : Maximum number of instances of the specified function that
> >> +               can be probed simultaneously, or 0 for the default.(*)
> >
> > Here, yoy don't need (*), since [MAXACTIVE] is not a FETCHARGS.
> 
> Why not? (*) refers to "(*) only for return probe." and the maxactive
> only makes sense for the kretprobe.

Because simply synopsis already explained MAXACTIVE is only for 'r' :)
The reason why I added the (*) note is that FETCHARGS are shown in
both synopsis of 'p' and 'r'.

> 
> >>   FETCHARGS   : Arguments. Each probe can have up to 128 args.
> >>    %REG               : Fetch register REG
> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> index 5f688cc..807e01c 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
> >>                                            void *addr,
> >>                                            const char *symbol,
> >>                                            unsigned long offs,
> >> +                                          int maxactive,
> >>                                            int nargs, bool is_return)
> >>  {
> >>       struct trace_kprobe *tk;
> >> @@ -309,6 +310,8 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
> >>       else
> >>               tk->rp.kp.pre_handler = kprobe_dispatcher;
> >>
> >> +     tk->rp.maxactive = maxactive;
> >> +
> >>       if (!event || !is_good_name(event)) {
> >>               ret = -EINVAL;
> >>               goto error;
> >> @@ -598,8 +601,10 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >>  {
> >>       /*
> >>        * Argument syntax:
> >> -      *  - Add kprobe: p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
> >> -      *  - Add kretprobe: r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
> >> +      *  - Add kprobe:
> >> +      *      p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
> >> +      *  - Add kretprobe:
> >> +      *      r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
> >>        * Fetch args:
> >>        *  $retval     : fetch return value
> >>        *  $stack      : fetch stack address
> >> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >>       int i, ret = 0;
> >>       bool is_return = false, is_delete = false;
> >>       char *symbol = NULL, *event = NULL, *group = NULL;
> >> +     int maxactive = 0;
> >>       char *arg;
> >>       unsigned long offset = 0;
> >>       void *addr = NULL;
> >> @@ -637,8 +643,26 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >>               return -EINVAL;
> >>       }
> >>
> >> -     if (argv[0][1] == ':') {
> >> +     if (is_return && isdigit(argv[0][1]) && strchr(&argv[0][1], ':')) {
> >
> > This only supports r[MAXACTIVE:[GRP/]EVENT]. e.g "r100" without event name.
> >
> > Thank you,
> 
> Ok, I will fix this.
> 
> By the way, the current code does not error out when there are extra characters:
> "pfuzz inet_csk_accept" is currently a valid command.
> I didn't change that.

OK, that is another improvement.

Thank you!

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ