netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: debug ATU Age Time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170328.215524.1898004534927511245.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        jcobham@...stertangent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: debug ATU Age Time

From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:13:53 -0400

> Hi David,
> 
> Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> writes:
> 
>> The ATU ageing time value programmed in the switch is rounded up to the
>> nearest multiple of its coefficient (variable depending on the model.)
>>
>> Add a debug message to inform the user about the exact programmed value.
>>
>> On 6352, "brctl setageing br0 18" gives "AgeTime set to 0x01 (15000 ms)"
>> while on 6390 we get "AgeTime set to 0x05 (18750 ms)".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
> 
> Can you pick this patch?

If it's not in a pending state in patchwork, there must be a reason.  And
that reason will tell you why I didn't apply it, and what needs to be
resolved in order to change that.

In any event, you have to at a minimum resubmit the patch.