lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:55:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, jcobham@...stertangent.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: debug ATU Age Time From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:13:53 -0400 > Hi David, > > Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> writes: > >> The ATU ageing time value programmed in the switch is rounded up to the >> nearest multiple of its coefficient (variable depending on the model.) >> >> Add a debug message to inform the user about the exact programmed value. >> >> On 6352, "brctl setageing br0 18" gives "AgeTime set to 0x01 (15000 ms)" >> while on 6390 we get "AgeTime set to 0x05 (18750 ms)". >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> > > Can you pick this patch? If it's not in a pending state in patchwork, there must be a reason. And that reason will tell you why I didn't apply it, and what needs to be resolved in order to change that. In any event, you have to at a minimum resubmit the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists