[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490888270.24891.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:37:50 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sock: avoid dirtying sk_stamp, if possible
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 16:23 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> That way, if the net timestamp is enable, we will record the timestamp
> of the first packet received by the socket (it can be far away in the
> past).
> I think is just a different kind of approximation.
I see.
This (64bit) sk_stamp stuff is quite buggy on 32bit kernels anyway.
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists