[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490843883.24891.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:18:03 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: possible race between tcp_done() and tcp_poll()
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 11:55 +0900, Seiichi Ikarashi wrote:
> I got a report that receiving a RST packet but poll() got only POLLERR, no POLLIN|POLLRDHUP .
> It was an old x86_64 kernel which does not include sk_state_{load,store} functions.
> I suspected some race might have occur above.
It looks that a one-liner patch would be enough in tcp_done()
No need adding extra barriers
Untested patch :
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 1e319a525d51b0b603a5ccc5143381c752b9f2c7..4107d3fc00a53f768cdb885971a1067c810f5c9f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -3285,12 +3285,12 @@ void tcp_done(struct sock *sk)
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT || sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
+ sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
tcp_clear_xmit_timers(sk);
if (req)
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
- sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists