netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: Mock-up driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170331165622.GK12814@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:56:22 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: Mock-up driver

> Actually we do not, because netdev_uses_dsa() returns true only when
> dst->rcv is different from NULL. When dst->rcv is NULL we completely
> bypass the DSA hook in eth_type_trans() and everything is well, the
> master network device is the one receiving packets.

static inline bool netdev_uses_dsa(struct net_device *dev)
{
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA)
        if (dev->dsa_ptr != NULL)
                return dsa_uses_tagged_protocol(dev->dsa_ptr);
#endif
        return false;
}

and

static inline bool dsa_uses_tagged_protocol(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
        return dst->rcv != NULL;
}

Yep, i just needed to dig further...

Thanks
	Andrew