lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35bef48734458fd995d9d4080da5db22@nuclearcat.com>
Date:   Mon, 03 Apr 2017 11:10:44 +0300
From:   Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@...learcat.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KASAN, xt_TCPMSS  finally found nasty use-after-free bug? 4.10.8

On 2017-04-02 20:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 10:14 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Could that be that netfilter does not abort earlier if TCP header is
>> completely wrong ?
>> 
> 
> Yes, I wonder if this patch would be better, unless we replicate the
> th->doff sanity check in all netfilter modules dissecting TCP frames.
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_tcpudp.c b/net/netfilter/xt_tcpudp.c
> index
> ade024c90f4f129a7c384e9e1cbfdb8ffe73065f..8cb4eadd5ba1c20e74bc27ee52a0bc36a5b26725
> 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_tcpudp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_tcpudp.c
> @@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ static bool tcp_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct xt_action_param *par)
>  	if (!NF_INVF(tcpinfo, XT_TCP_INV_FLAGS,
>  		     (((unsigned char *)th)[13] & tcpinfo->flg_mask) == 
> tcpinfo->flg_cmp))
>  		return false;
> +	if (th->doff * 4 < sizeof(_tcph)) {
> +		par->hotdrop = true;
> +		return false;
> +	}
>  	if (tcpinfo->option) {
> -		if (th->doff * 4 < sizeof(_tcph)) {
> -			par->hotdrop = true;
> -			return false;
> -		}
>  		if (!tcp_find_option(tcpinfo->option, skb, par->thoff,
>  				     th->doff*4 - sizeof(_tcph),
>  				     tcpinfo->invflags & XT_TCP_INV_OPTION,
I modified patch a little as:
if (th->doff * 4 < sizeof(_tcph)) {
  par->hotdrop = true;
  WARN_ON_ONCE(!tcpinfo->option);
  return false;
}

And it did triggered WARN once at morning, and didn't hit KASAN. I will 
run for a while more, to see if it is ok, and then if stable, will try 
to enable SFQ again.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ