lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Apr 2017 08:23:23 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 07/10] dt-bindings: net: add binding for QCA7000
 UART

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:18:03PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 27.03.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com> wrote:
> >> This is the serdev binding for the QCA7000 UART driver (Ethernet over UART).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> According to this binding are still some questions:
> >>
> >> Where should be the optional hardware flow control defined (at master or slave side)?
> > Probably should be in the slave side. We already have uart-has-rtscts
> > and rts/cts-gpios for the UART. Those mean we have RTS/CTS, but not
> > necessarily that we want to enable them.
> >
> > In many cases, the driver may know what it needs.
> 
> Like all the other UART settings the hardware flow control can be
> configured in the QCA7000 firmware and the driver can't detect it.
> 
> Property suggestion for the slave side:
> 
> use-rtscts

Okay.

> >> Is it okay to have two bindings (qca-qca7000-spi and qca-qca7000-uart) or should they be merged?
> > Are they mutually-exclusive or both are used at the same time?
> 
> They are mutually-exclusive because they use the same pins.
> 
> >  What
> > are the dependencies between the interfaces?
> 
> Except they uses the same pins of the QCA7000, i can't see any dependency.

I think they should be a single doc.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists