[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491362429.4536.77.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:20:29 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: net/sched: latent livelock in dev_deactivate_many() due to
yield() usage
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 15:39 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the report! Looks like a quick solution here is to replace
> this yield() with cond_resched(), it is harder to really wait for
> all qdisc's to transmit all packets.
No, cond_resched() won't help. What I did is below, but I suspect net
wizards will do something better.
---
net/sched/sch_generic.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/swait.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
@@ -901,6 +902,7 @@ static bool some_qdisc_is_busy(struct ne
*/
void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_head *head)
{
+ DECLARE_SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(swait);
struct net_device *dev;
bool sync_needed = false;
@@ -924,8 +926,7 @@ void dev_deactivate_many(struct list_hea
/* Wait for outstanding qdisc_run calls. */
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, close_list)
- while (some_qdisc_is_busy(dev))
- yield();
+ swait_event_timeout(swait, !some_qdisc_is_busy(dev), 1);
}
void dev_deactivate(struct net_device *dev)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists