[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406211431.GD12763@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:14:31 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] crypto: CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME is too low
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:58:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:15:09 +0800
>
> > As the final patch depends on all three it would be easiest if
> > we pushed the xfrm patch through the crypto tree. Steffen/David?
>
> No objections from me for this going through the crypto tree.
I have no objections too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists