[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170406174531.4fca96b0@plumbers-lap.home.lan>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:45:31 -0400
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: hiren panchasara <hiren@...ugglingcoder.info>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcpprobe display format for snd_nxt and snd_una
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:40:09 -0700
hiren panchasara <hiren@...ugglingcoder.info> wrote:
> (New to linux and first-time poster so please guide me if needed.)
>
> Upon using tcpprobe I realized that it prints snd_nxt and snd_una as hex
> which makes it harder to read and compare with tcpdump for example.
>
> Not sure if that is intentional. If not, a simple patch like this would
> print them as decimals.
>
> [PATCH] Display snd_nxt and snd_una as decimals for better
> readability.
>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c
> index f6c50af..a8e66c1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int tcpprobe_sprint(char *tbuf, int n)
> = ktime_to_timespec64(ktime_sub(p->tstamp, tcp_probe.start));
>
> return scnprintf(tbuf, n,
> - "%lu.%09lu %pISpc %pISpc %d %#x %#x %u %u %u %u %u\n",
> + "%lu.%09lu %pISpc %pISpc %d %u %u %u %u %u %u %u\n",
> (unsigned long)ts.tv_sec,
> (unsigned long)ts.tv_nsec,
> &p->src, &p->dst, p->length, p->snd_nxt, p->snd_una,
> --
>
> Let me know if I am missing something obvious.
The output of tcpprobe is intended for consumption by programs.
Changing the output format would be considered a kernel ABI breakage which
is something Linux tries not to do. Therefore I would prefer it
not be changed. Sorry if this is inconvenient for you but breaking other
users scripts would be a bigger problem.
Also, your patch email is not formatted with subject [RFC] or [PATCH]
and is missing signed-off-by.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists