[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1491591795.5800.3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 21:03:15 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: remove struct bpf_prog_type_list
So two things about this, and they apply to the other patch as well:
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops tc_cls_act_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops xdp_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops cg_skb_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops cg_sock_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops lwt_inout_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops lwt_xmit_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops kprobe_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops tracepoint_prog_ops;
> +extern const struct bpf_verifier_ops perf_event_prog_ops;
I'm not super happy with having to list it here - and maybe I should
add ifdefs here as well.
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops * const bpf_prog_types[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER] = &sk_filter_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS] = &tc_cls_act_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT] = &tc_cls_act_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP] = &xdp_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB] = &cg_skb_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK] = &cg_sock_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN] = &lwt_inout_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT] = &lwt_inout_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT] = &lwt_xmit_prog_ops,
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE] = &kprobe_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT] = &tracepoint_prog_ops,
> + [BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT] = &perf_event_prog_ops,
> +#endif
And here I list it again.
Something I considered was to add the prog_type to the ops struct, and
use the linker (putting this into a special section) to assemble an
array. But that
* makes the lwt_inout_prog_ops that are shared not work without
duplicating
* requires more complicated search code
This seems optimal for the resulting binary, but it's a bunch more
typing.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists