netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/5] netlink: extended ACK reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1491676621.5800.24.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:37:01 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        pablo@...filter.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] netlink: extended ACK reporting

On Sat, 2017-04-08 at 20:34 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> nla_total_size(sizeof(u32));
> > +			if (extack &&
> > +			    (extack->missing_attr || extack-
> > >bad_attr))
> 
> Attr could be 0, right? I know that on the most of the places 0 is
> UNSPEC, but I'm pretty sure not everywhere.

Yeah, I guess we can't show a missing attribute of 0 now - bad_attr is
a pointer so no problem there.

I think I'll leave it like this - if anyone really wants to say
"attribute 0 is missing" then we can add a flag later... The UAPI does
take this into account by not including the attribute at all if the
data is invalid, so 0 in the userspace API can be done

johannes