[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170408160745.14328-21-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 11:07:43 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
hdegoede@...hat.com, hadess@...ess.net, jes.sorensen@...il.com,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Subject: [PATCH 20/22] staging rtl8723bs: Fix indenting errors and an off-by-one mistake in core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
Smatch lists the following:
CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:525 _mgt_dispatcher() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:1595 OnAssocReq() error: buffer overflow 'pstapriv->sta_aid' 32 <= 32
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2391 dump_mgntframe_and_wait() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:2420 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:4969 process_80211d() error: testing array offset 'i' after use.
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:5738 linked_status_chk() warn: inconsistent indenting
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c:6459 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl() warn: inconsistent indenting
The indenting problems were fixed with white-space changes. The error at
line 1595 was the result of an off-by-one error in a for loop. The error
at line 4969 was not fixed as that code lies inside a block of code that
only is needed for 5G channels. This chip only works at 2.4 GHz.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index e0a3cd64777f..18e78d5198c3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -522,15 +522,14 @@ static void _mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, struct mlme_handler *ptabl
u8 bc_addr[ETH_ALEN] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff};
u8 *pframe = precv_frame->u.hdr.rx_data;
- if (ptable->func) {
- /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
- if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
- memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
- return;
-
- ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
- }
+ if (ptable->func) {
+ /* receive the frames that ra(a1) is my address or ra(a1) is bc address. */
+ if (memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), myid(&padapter->eeprompriv), ETH_ALEN) &&
+ memcmp(GetAddr1Ptr(pframe), bc_addr, ETH_ALEN))
+ return;
+ ptable->func(padapter, precv_frame);
+ }
}
void mgt_dispatcher(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
@@ -1575,7 +1574,7 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
if (pstat->aid > 0) {
DBG_871X(" old AID %d\n", pstat->aid);
} else {
- for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid <= NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
+ for (pstat->aid = 1; pstat->aid < NUM_STA; pstat->aid++)
if (pstapriv->sta_aid[pstat->aid - 1] == NULL)
break;
@@ -2388,7 +2387,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntfr
pxmitbuf->sctx = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pxmitpriv->lock_sctx, irqL);
- return ret;
+ return ret;
}
s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmgntframe)
@@ -2417,7 +2416,7 @@ s32 dump_mgntframe_and_wait_ack(struct adapter *padapter, struct xmit_frame *pmg
mutex_unlock(&pxmitpriv->ack_tx_mutex);
}
- return ret;
+ return ret;
}
static int update_hidden_ssid(u8 *ies, u32 ies_len, u8 hidden_ssid_mode)
@@ -5735,7 +5734,7 @@ void linked_status_chk(struct adapter *padapter)
#else
rx_chk_limit = 8;
#endif
- link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */
+ link_count_limit = 7; /* 16 sec */
/* Marked by Kurt 20130715 */
/* For WiDi 3.5 and latered on, they don't ask WiDi sink to do roaming, so we could not check rx limit that strictly. */
@@ -6456,7 +6455,7 @@ u8 sitesurvey_cmd_hdl(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf)
Switch_DM_Func(padapter, DYNAMIC_FUNC_DISABLE, false);
/* config the initial gain under scaning, need to write the BB registers */
- initialgain = 0x1e;
+ initialgain = 0x1e;
rtw_hal_set_hwreg(padapter, HW_VAR_INITIAL_GAIN, (u8 *)(&initialgain));
--
2.12.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists