netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: micrel: KSZ9031: fix crash when statistic requested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <050b6778-276b-7094-36e1-1ccd06364766@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:17:56 -0500
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: micrel: KSZ9031: fix crash when statistic
 requested



On 04/10/2017 06:40 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 04:33 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Now the command:
>> 	ethtool --phy-statistics eth0
>> will cause system crash with meassage "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
>> dereference at virtual address 00000010" from:
>>
>>  (kszphy_get_stats) from [<c069f1d8>] (ethtool_get_phy_stats+0xd8/0x210)
>>  (ethtool_get_phy_stats) from [<c06a0738>] (dev_ethtool+0x5b8/0x228c)
>>  (dev_ethtool) from [<c06b5484>] (dev_ioctl+0x3fc/0x964)
>>  (dev_ioctl) from [<c0679f7c>] (sock_ioctl+0x170/0x2c0)
>>  (sock_ioctl) from [<c02419d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0xa8/0x95c)
>>  (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c02422c4>] (SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x64)
>>  (SyS_ioctl) from [<c0107d60>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x44)
>>
>> The reason: phy_driver structure for KSZ9031 phy has no .probe() callback
>> defined. As result, struct phy_device *phydev->priv pointer will not be
>> initializes (null).
> 
> This is a strange way to fix the problem, presumably this PHY supports
> fetching statistics, if that is the case it sounds like we would want to
> sort of provide two probe function:
> 
> - one which is just allocating the PHY device's private structure so we
> have enough room for statistics
> - another one which is doing all the reference clock fetching and so on
> 
> By adding a NULL pointer check here, you'd be better off just removing
> all the function pointers pertaining to ethtool statistics.

I've considered all this option, honestly, but I do not know if this
phys (issue should affect KSZ886X, KSZ8873MLL, KSZ9031, KSZ9021, KSZ8061, KS8737)
support fetching statistics or not and was hoping to get feedback from community.

Simples way for me was to block statistic callbacks for them,
but I, of course, can just remove those callback for above phys if this is acceptable.

> 
>>
>> Fix it by adding additional checks for !phydev->priv in
>> kszphy_get_stats(), kszphy_get_strings() and kszphy_get_sset_count()
>>
>> Fixes: 2b2427d06426 ("phy: micrel: Add ethtool statistics counters")
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> index 6742070..8dbc1be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
>> @@ -574,7 +574,6 @@ static int ksz9031_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>  				MII_KSZ9031RN_TX_DATA_PAD_SKEW, 4,
>>  				tx_data_skews, 4);
>>  	}
>> -
>>  	return ksz9031_center_flp_timing(phydev);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -654,6 +653,9 @@ ksz9021_wr_mmd_phyreg(struct phy_device *phydev, int ptrad, int devnum,
>>  
>>  static int kszphy_get_sset_count(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>  {
>> +	if (!phydev->priv)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>>  	return ARRAY_SIZE(kszphy_hw_stats);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -661,6 +663,9 @@ static void kszphy_get_strings(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 *data)
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>>  
>> +	if (!phydev->priv)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kszphy_hw_stats); i++) {
>>  		memcpy(data + i * ETH_GSTRING_LEN,
>>  		       kszphy_hw_stats[i].string, ETH_GSTRING_LEN);
>> @@ -694,6 +699,9 @@ static void kszphy_get_stats(struct phy_device *phydev,
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>>  
>> +	if (!phydev->priv)
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kszphy_hw_stats); i++)
>>  		data[i] = kszphy_get_stat(phydev, i);
>>  }
>>
> 
> 

-- 
regards,
-grygorii