lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:13:45 +1000 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ftgmac100: Upgrade to NETIF_F_HW_CSUM On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 13:57 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Need {} here as well since the 1st branch has it -- see > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst (the end of the section 3). Adding {} in that specific statements just makes things more cluttered and less readable. I can find a ton of examples of if (...) { multi lines ... } else if (...) single_line() In existing kernel code. I'll fix it in a next spin if Dave wants it that way but otherwise I'm keen to leave it as it is. Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists