netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: stmmac: add drop transmit status feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13ddd2d8-c2a4-4983-a9af-8e34f605374c@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:13:33 +0100
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:     <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: stmmac: add drop transmit status feature

Hello,

Às 3:51 PM de 4/12/2017, David Miller escreveu:
> From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:55:03 +0100
> 
>> Understand your point, but for now our development and testing setup will be
>> based on the IP Prototyping Kit, consisting of a FPGA + PHY.
> 
> That's completely, and utterly, unacceptable.
> 
> I will be quite frank with you, that instances like this are causing
> people to contact me privately and telling me that your handling of
> becomming the stmmac driver maintainer is causing very real and
> serious concerns.

So, adding features to the driver are causing concerns to people? People don't
have to worry about maintenance, since goals are not to be a maintainer. My job
is just to help improve and add missing features to the driver and that's it.

> 
> You cannot develop performance based features and only test their
> impact on FPGA when almost all users are on real silicon.
> 
> And this requirement is absolutely non-negotiable.
> 
> You must test the impact on real silicon otherwise your performance
> numbers, which are required to be provided in the commit message
> for any "performance" feature or change, are completely useless.

Next time I won't mention anything about performance, honestly. "Drop TX Status"
is just an IP Core feature that can or not be used, it is up to the driver user.

> 
> I want your attitude on these matters to change quickly, as myself
> and many other interested parties are becomming extremely frustrated
> with how you are handling things.

Attitude? Are there complaints with my attitude? I try to help in everything I
can, I listen to feedback, I did the rework on the Multiple Buffers patch to try
to solve the negative impact in sunxi board. Sincerely I don't see a bad attitude.

Are you mentioning the e-mail about sxgbe?

> 
> Thank you.
> 

Thank you.