[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB14123B438231A0EFAC4DCBCBCA030@BLUPR03MB1412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:24:36 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next,1/3] hv_netvsc: Use per socket hash when
available
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 10:13 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>;
> olaf@...fle.de; vkuznets@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,1/3] hv_netvsc: Use per socket hash when
> available
>
> From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...hange.microsoft.com>
> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:53:59 -0700
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > index f24c289..0a129cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> > @@ -211,9 +211,14 @@ static u16 netvsc_select_queue(struct net_device
> *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > int q_idx = sk_tx_queue_get(sk);
> >
> > if (q_idx < 0 || skb->ooo_okay || q_idx >= num_tx_queues) {
> > - u16 hash = __skb_tx_hash(ndev, skb, VRSS_SEND_TAB_SIZE);
> > + u16 hash;
> > int new_idx;
> >
> > + if (sk)
> > + skb_set_hash_from_sk(skb, sk);
> > +
> > + hash = __skb_tx_hash(ndev, skb, VRSS_SEND_TAB_SIZE);
>
> Please do not do this.
>
> TCP performs this operation for you for every pack it emits.
>
> And also every socket family that uses skb_set_owner_w() either
> directly or indirectly gets this done as well.
>
> I do not want to see drivers start to get peppered with calls to this
> thing.
>
> Explain the case which is missing that matters, and we can address
> that instead.
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for pointing this out. I did some tests, the skb->hash is indeed
set to the sk->sk_txhash by upper layer. I will remove this patch, and
re-submit other patches.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists