[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02874ECE860811409154E81DA85FBB5857E0123F@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:24:16 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
"Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <soheil@...gle.com>,
Denny Page <dennypage@...com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 6/7] net: allow simultaneous SW and HW transmit
timestamping
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlichvar@...hat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:00 AM
>
> Oh, I see. I was struggling to find a good name for this option.
>
> > The name for this option is therefore not very descriptive. Perhaps
> > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_BOTH_SW_HW.
>
> Simultaneous SW/HW timestamping was already possible for incoming
> packets. Maybe _OPT_TX_SWHW would be better?
>
This sounds more accurate to me.
Thanks,
Jake
> --
> Miroslav Lichvar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists