[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-LR0g3HL0-=P_g7PjhcRx_L6TYpP2qQoE=5MQFhB+5JzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:17:42 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Denny Page <dennypage@...com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] net: allow simultaneous SW and HW transmit timestamping
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Keller, Jacob E
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlichvar@...hat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:00 AM
>>
>> Oh, I see. I was struggling to find a good name for this option.
>>
>> > The name for this option is therefore not very descriptive. Perhaps
>> > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_BOTH_SW_HW.
>>
>> Simultaneous SW/HW timestamping was already possible for incoming
>> packets. Maybe _OPT_TX_SWHW would be better?
>>
>
> This sounds more accurate to me.
Agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists