[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170413.134937.410754519019663582.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 13:49:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mahesh@...dewar.net
Cc: j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, vfalico@...il.com,
nikolay@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
maheshb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] bonding: handle link transition from FAIL to UP
correctly
From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:36:00 -0700
> From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>
> When link transitions from LINK_FAIL to LINK_UP, the commit phase is
> not called. This leads to an erroneous state causing slave-link state to
> get stuck in "going down" state while its speed and duplex are perfectly
> fine. This issue is a side-effect of splitting link-set into propose and
> commit phases introduced by de77ecd4ef02 ("bonding: improve link-status
> update in mii-monitoring")
>
> This patch fixes these issues by calling commit phase whenever link
> state change is proposed.
>
> Fixes: de77ecd4ef02 ("bonding: improve link-status update in mii-monitoring")
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists