netdev - Re: TPACKET_V3 timeout bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170415224530.GA21010@oracle.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:45:36 -0400
From:   Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TPACKET_V3 timeout bug?

On (04/15/17 21:40), Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
> In my case, lan3 is up and idle, there are no packets flying around to
> be captured. So i would expect pcap_next_ex() to exit once a second,
> with a return value of 0. But it is not, it blocks and stays blocked.
   :
> Looking at the libpcap source, the 1000ms timeout is being used as
> part of the setsockopt(3, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_RX_RING, 0xbe9445c0, 28)
> call, req.tp_retire_blk_tov is set to the timeoutval.

right, aiui, the retire_blk_tov will only kick in if we have at
least one frame in a block, but the block is not filled up yet,
before the req.tp_retire_blk_tov (1s in your case) expires.

If there are 0 frames pending, we should not be waking up the app,
so everything seems to be behaving as it should?

--Sowmini