netdev - Re: [PATCH next RFC] net: sched: mirred: move xmit to tasklet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1492532289.10587.128.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:18:09 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next RFC] net: sched: mirred: move xmit to tasklet

On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 15:03 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> mirred is prone to deadlocks as it invokes dev_queue_xmit while
> holding one or more qdisc locks.
> 
> Avoid lock recursions by moving tx context to a tasklet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> ---
>  This a stab at removing the lock recursions discussed during netconf.
> 
>  Taking the cost of the tasklet appears to be the only solution;
>  i tried to use a percpu 'history' instead but its not clear to
>  me that this avoids all corner cases.
> 
>  While this patch doesn't avoid loops we don't hang the kernel
>  anymore and removing the 'looping' filter makes things calm
>  down again (there are also other ways to create such loops anyway,
>  including use of a cable... )
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> index 1b5549ababd4..3dd61eba4741 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> +#include <linux/skb_array.h>
>  #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -25,10 +26,19 @@
>  #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>  #include <net/netlink.h>
>  #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> +#include <net/dst.h>
>  #include <linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
>  #include <net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
>  
> +#define MIRRED_TXLEN	  512

Using an skb array looks overkill to me, especially if using per cpu
queue. A standard skb list should be good enough ?


> +static void mirred_cleanup_pcpu(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		struct mirred_tx_data *data;
> +
> +		data = per_cpu_ptr(&mirred_tx_data, cpu);
> +
> +		skb_array_cleanup(&data->skb_array);

This wont do the dev_put() on skb->dev

> +		tasklet_kill(&data->mirred_tasklet);

You might need to kill the tasklet _before_ doing the cleanup ?

> +	}
> +}
> +