lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWxZj8JPOfrQQzhhe=T+Z8-DHk5w+6ccUhTvYAv9Wz8kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:32:27 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@...xmox.com>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/2] net sched actions: decrement module refcount earlier

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller
<w.bumiller@...xmox.com> wrote:
>> On April 19, 2017 at 1:32 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>> My suggestion:
>> If we move the cookie allocation before init we can save it and
>> only when init succeeds do we attach it to the action, otherwise
>> we free it on error path.
>
> Shouldn't the old code have freed an old a->act_cookie as well before
> replacing it then? nla_memdup_cookie() starts off by assigning a->act_cookie.
>

Yeah. Looks even better, we can totally avoid rollback the action modification
rollback on failure.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ