[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <273c17d9-d424-ae4d-f282-976b7a1daa8a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:54:42 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it
Em 20-04-2017 09:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso escreveu:
> Hi
>
> According to the documentation I should have sent this to
> netdev@...r.kernel.org rather than stable@...r.kernel.org.
>
> Rationale: Whilst 00eff2ebbd229758e90659907724c14dd5a18339 went to
> stable, the dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 commit is
> missing.
Cc'ing Greg too.
This is probably because I noticed this commit was missing when Greg
posted the commits being considered for backports, then I raised the
concern and Greg decided to pull it too before David replied.
Not sure if this caused some out-of-the-process stuff.
>
> Full quoting, my original misleaded mail:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:44:05PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Apparently the following commit
>>
>> dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 (sctp: deny peeloff operation
>> on asocs with threads sleeping on it)
>>
>> (was not CC'ed stable@...r.kernel.org, but was already applied in
>> 3.2.87 and 3.16.42) is missing from 4.9:
>>
>> 2dcab598484185dea7ec22219c76dcdd59e3cb90 was included in 4.9.11 via
>> 00eff2ebbd229758e90659907724c14dd5a18339 . But
>> dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 is missing from 4.9.
>>
>> This was assigned CVE-2017-6353.
>>
>> Reference:
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148785309416337&w=2
>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/27/2
>>
>> Regards,
>> Salvatore
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists