netdev - Re: sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:54:42 -0300
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it

Em 20-04-2017 09:32, Salvatore Bonaccorso escreveu:
> Hi
> 
> According to the documentation I should have sent this to
> netdev@...r.kernel.org rather than stable@...r.kernel.org.
> 
> Rationale: Whilst 00eff2ebbd229758e90659907724c14dd5a18339 went to
> stable, the dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 commit is
> missing.

Cc'ing Greg too.

This is probably because I noticed this commit was missing when Greg 
posted the commits being considered for backports, then I raised the 
concern and Greg decided to pull it too before David replied.

Not sure if this caused some out-of-the-process stuff.

> 
> Full quoting, my original misleaded mail:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:44:05PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Apparently the following commit
>>
>> dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 (sctp: deny peeloff operation
>> on asocs with threads sleeping on it)
>>
>> (was not CC'ed stable@...r.kernel.org, but was already applied in
>> 3.2.87 and 3.16.42) is missing from 4.9:
>>
>> 2dcab598484185dea7ec22219c76dcdd59e3cb90 was included in 4.9.11 via
>> 00eff2ebbd229758e90659907724c14dd5a18339 . But
>> dfcb9f4f99f1e9a49e43398a7bfbf56927544af1 is missing from 4.9.
>>
>> This was assigned CVE-2017-6353.
>>
>> Reference:
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148785309416337&w=2
>> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/27/2
>>
>> Regards,
>> Salvatore
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>