[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170420.112340.1425759737710664373.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:23:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net sched actions: dump more than
TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 05:18:14 -0700
> By changing the kernel and recognizing new flags in existing padding,
> you might break the programs.
>
> This is not acceptable. Period.
>
> Had we checked the padding being 0 in old kernels, this change would
> have been possible today.
I completely agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists