netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95110642-0f9c-d622-3ca5-16ad5115da2f@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:38:14 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     eric.dumazet@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

On 17-04-20 11:50 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:27:00 -0400
>
>> The issue Jiri is bringing up is unrelated. He is talking about
>> a bitmap and conflating it with a data structure. They are not
>> the same issue.
>
> Bitmaps can have the same exact problem as padding if we didn't code
> it correctly.
>
> The issue is _purely_, "did we check unused 'fields' and enforce them
> to be a certain value"
>
> If not, we lose, and can't use those "fields" in the future.
>
> This rule applies whether you are speaking about padding or a bitmask.
>

There are no examples of such issues with bitmasks encapsulated in TLVs
that exist.
I grep iproute2 code and there are tons of example of bitmask flags
being sent in TLVs. They all start with:

u64/32/16 mybitflags = 0;

if i want foo then
        mybitflags |= BRIDGE_FLAGS_SELF;
if i want bar then
        mybitflags |= xxxx

addattr16/32/64(&req.n, sizeof(req), ATTR_XXX, mybitflags);

It does not make much sense to have a TLV for each of these
bits when i can fit a bunch of them in u16/32/64.

cheers,
jamal