[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170420232349.GA25174@fqdn.specialj.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:23:49 -0700
From: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>
To: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: Prevent from dereferencing null pointer when
releasing SKB
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:03:43PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 11:25 -0700, Myungho Jung wrote:
> > Added NULL check to make __dev_kfree_skb_irq consistent with kfree
> > family of functions.
> >
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195289
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Myungho Jung <mhjungk@...il.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the patch is fine but I'm confused by the subject. You mention
> p54 driver but the change is in dev.c. I know the bugzilla references
> the p54 but that's not where the change is.
>
> Seems odd to me.
>
> - Greg
>
> > ---
> > net/core/dev.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index 7869ae3..22be2a6 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -2450,6 +2450,9 @@ void __dev_kfree_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb, enum skb_free_reason reason)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > + if (unlikely(!skb))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) {
> > smp_rmb();
> > atomic_set(&skb->users, 0);
>
>
>
Hi Greg,
Thank you for checking my patch. I missed that I moved change from p54
to net/dev. Do I need to resubmit patch v2 to modify subject?
Thanks,
Myungho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists