lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170421.120719.110454615745765701.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:     eric.dumazet@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:40:00 -0400

> Eric: Your are speaking in generalities and you starting premise is
> wrong.

I disagree.

If we never checked, it is our problem and our issue.  Not that of
the user.

If you want to start checking and verifying new attribute bitmasks
now, great!  But we are stuck in the case of existing bitmasks
and pads because we did not do so at the time we released them
into the wild.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ