[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170421.211937.393214469332032143.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 21:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sparc64: eBPF JIT
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:57:09 -0700
> Alternative idea: can the above
> 'add FP, STACK_BIAS, one_of_local_regs' be done once in prologue
> and that register used as substitue for R10 ?
After much consideration I think this is what I'm going to end up
doing, I should have listened to you from the beginning :-)
It will simplify the JIT significantly.
Now I will just have to completely trust that the verifier has audited
all the FP accesses properly. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists