lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70133247-4f2f-1563-161e-9c84cb97ed4f@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:58:33 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     simon.horman@...ronome.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, tom@...bertland.com, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

On 17-04-24 06:24 PM, David Miller wrote:

>
> I think we should eat the pain now and use the strict checks
> for all new features like this.
>
> I'm sorry if this makes more work for you, but this is really
> how we have to proceed moving forward.
>

There is no work for me to do in tc if i push this in without
the liberal flag i was suggesting.
This is more about the next flag change that will fail with
older kernels unless the large tc change happens
i.e future ones after this kernel patch.

cheers,
jamal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ