[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170425121338.GC1867@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:13:38 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch
Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:54:06PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
>When you dump hundreds of thousands of actions, getting only 32 per
>dump batch even when the socket buffer and memory allocations allow
>is inefficient.
>
>With this change, the user will get as many as possibly fitting
>within the given constraints available to the kernel.
>
>The top level action TLV space is extended. An attribute
>TCA_ROOT_FLAGS is used to carry flags; flag TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON
>is set by the user indicating the user is capable of processing
>these large dumps. Older user space which doesnt set this flag
>doesnt get the large (than 32) batches.
>The kernel uses the TCA_ROOT_COUNT attribute to tell the user how many
>actions are put in a single batch. As such user space app knows how long
>to iterate (independent of the type of action being dumped)
>instead of hardcoded maximum of 32.
>
>Some results dumping 1.5M actions, first unpatched tc which the
>kernel doesnt help:
>
>prompt$ time -p tc actions ls action gact | grep index | wc -l
>1500000
>real 1388.43
>user 2.07
>sys 1386.79
>
>Now lets see a patched tc which sets the correct flags when requesting
>a dump:
>
>prompt$ time -p updatedtc actions ls action gact | grep index | wc -l
>1500000
>real 178.13
>user 2.02
>sys 176.96
>
>That is about 8x performance improvement for tc which sets its
>receive buffer to about 32K.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>---
> include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 22 ++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_api.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>index cce0613..5875467 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>@@ -674,10 +674,28 @@ struct tcamsg {
> unsigned char tca__pad1;
> unsigned short tca__pad2;
> };
>+
>+enum {
>+ TCA_ROOT_UNSPEC,
>+ TCA_ROOT_TAB,
>+#define TCA_ACT_TAB TCA_ROOT_TAB
>+ TCA_ROOT_FLAGS,
>+ TCA_ROOT_COUNT,
>+ __TCA_ROOT_MAX,
>+#define TCA_ROOT_MAX (__TCA_ROOT_MAX - 1)
>+};
>+
> #define TA_RTA(r) ((struct rtattr*)(((char*)(r)) + NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct tcamsg))))
> #define TA_PAYLOAD(n) NLMSG_PAYLOAD(n,sizeof(struct tcamsg))
>-#define TCA_ACT_TAB 1 /* attr type must be >=1 */
>-#define TCAA_MAX 1
>+/* tcamsg flags stored in attribute TCA_ROOT_FLAGS
>+ *
>+ * TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON user->kernel to request for larger than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO
>+ * actions in a dump. All dump responses will contain the number of actions
>+ * being dumped stored in for user app's consumption in TCA_ROOT_COUNT
>+ *
>+ */
>+#define TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON (1 << 0)
BIT (I think I mentioned this before)
>+#define VALID_TCA_FLAGS TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON
Again, namespace please. "TCA_ROOT_FLAGS_VALID"
Why is this UAPI?
>
> /* New extended info filters for IFLA_EXT_MASK */
> #define RTEXT_FILTER_VF (1 << 0)
>diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
>index 9ce22b7..2756213 100644
>--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
>@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netlink_callback *cb)
> {
> int err = 0, index = -1, i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0;
>+ u32 act_flags = cb->args[2];
> struct nlattr *nest;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&hinfo->lock);
>@@ -111,14 +112,18 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
> n_i++;
>- if (n_i >= TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO)
>+ if (!(act_flags & TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON) &&
>+ n_i >= TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO)
> goto done;
> }
> }
> done:
> spin_unlock_bh(&hinfo->lock);
>- if (n_i)
>+ if (n_i) {
> cb->args[0] += n_i;
>+ if (act_flags & TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON)
>+ cb->args[1] = n_i;
>+ }
> return n_i;
>
> nla_put_failure:
>@@ -993,11 +998,15 @@ static int tcf_action_add(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> return tcf_add_notify(net, n, &actions, portid);
> }
>
>+static const struct nla_policy tcaa_policy[TCA_ROOT_MAX + 1] = {
>+ [TCA_ROOT_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>+};
>+
> static int tc_ctl_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
>- struct nlattr *tca[TCAA_MAX + 1];
>+ struct nlattr *tca[TCA_ROOT_MAX + 1];
> u32 portid = skb ? NETLINK_CB(skb).portid : 0;
> int ret = 0, ovr = 0;
>
>@@ -1005,7 +1014,7 @@ static int tc_ctl_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> !netlink_capable(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
>
>- ret = nlmsg_parse(n, sizeof(struct tcamsg), tca, TCAA_MAX, NULL,
>+ ret = nlmsg_parse(n, sizeof(struct tcamsg), tca, TCA_ROOT_MAX, NULL,
> extack);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>@@ -1046,16 +1055,12 @@ static int tc_ctl_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> return ret;
> }
>
>-static struct nlattr *find_dump_kind(const struct nlmsghdr *n)
>+static struct nlattr *find_dump_kind(struct nlattr **nla)
> {
> struct nlattr *tb1, *tb2[TCA_ACT_MAX + 1];
> struct nlattr *tb[TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO + 1];
>- struct nlattr *nla[TCAA_MAX + 1];
> struct nlattr *kind;
>
>- if (nlmsg_parse(n, sizeof(struct tcamsg), nla, TCAA_MAX,
>- NULL, NULL) < 0)
>- return NULL;
> tb1 = nla[TCA_ACT_TAB];
> if (tb1 == NULL)
> return NULL;
>@@ -1073,6 +1078,16 @@ static struct nlattr *find_dump_kind(const struct nlmsghdr *n)
> return kind;
> }
>
>+static inline bool tca_flags_valid(u32 act_flags)
>+{
>+ u32 invalid_flags_mask = ~VALID_TCA_FLAGS;
>+
>+ if (act_flags & invalid_flags_mask)
>+ return false;
I don't see how this resolves anything. VALID_TCA_FLAGS is set in stone
not going to change anytime in future, right? Then the TCA_ROOT_FLAGS
attr will always contain only one flag, right?
Then, I don't see why do we need this dance... u8 flag attr resolves
this in elegant way. I know I sound like a broken record. This is the
last time I'm commenting on this. I give up.
>+
>+ return true;
>+}
>+
> static int tc_dump_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> {
> struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
>@@ -1082,8 +1097,18 @@ static int tc_dump_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> struct tc_action_ops *a_o;
> int ret = 0;
> struct tcamsg *t = (struct tcamsg *) nlmsg_data(cb->nlh);
>- struct nlattr *kind = find_dump_kind(cb->nlh);
>+ struct nlattr *count_attr = NULL;
>+ struct nlattr *tb[TCA_ROOT_MAX + 1];
>+ struct nlattr *kind = NULL;
>+ u32 act_flags = 0;
>+ u32 act_count = 0;
>+
>+ ret = nlmsg_parse(cb->nlh, sizeof(struct tcamsg), tb, TCA_ROOT_MAX,
>+ tcaa_policy, NULL);
>+ if (ret < 0)
>+ return ret;
>
>+ kind = find_dump_kind(tb);
> if (kind == NULL) {
> pr_info("tc_dump_action: action bad kind\n");
> return 0;
>@@ -1093,14 +1118,25 @@ static int tc_dump_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> if (a_o == NULL)
> return 0;
>
>+ if (tb[TCA_ROOT_FLAGS])
>+ act_flags = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_ROOT_FLAGS]);
>+
>+ if (act_flags && !tca_flags_valid(act_flags))
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+
> nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
> cb->nlh->nlmsg_type, sizeof(*t), 0);
> if (!nlh)
> goto out_module_put;
>+
>+ cb->args[2] = act_flags;
> t = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> t->tca_family = AF_UNSPEC;
> t->tca__pad1 = 0;
> t->tca__pad2 = 0;
>+ count_attr = nla_reserve(skb, TCA_ROOT_COUNT, sizeof(u32));
>+ if (!count_attr)
>+ goto out_module_put;
>
> nest = nla_nest_start(skb, TCA_ACT_TAB);
> if (nest == NULL)
>@@ -1113,6 +1149,9 @@ static int tc_dump_action(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> if (ret > 0) {
> nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
> ret = skb->len;
>+ act_count = cb->args[1];
>+ memcpy(nla_data(count_attr), &act_count, sizeof(u32));
>+ cb->args[1] = 0;
> } else
> nlmsg_trim(skb, b);
>
>--
>1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists