[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170425.104822.1395000926293799711.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:48:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rhashtable: remove insecure_max_entries param
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:17:49 +0200
> I'd have less of an issue with this if we'd be talking about
> something computationally expensive, but this is about storing
> an extra value inside a struct just to avoid one "shr" in insert path...
Agreed, this shift is probably filling an available cpu cycle :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists