netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:17:59 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

On 17-04-26 09:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:42:17PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:

>> +#define VALID_TCA_ROOT_FLAGS TCA_FLAG_LARGE_DUMP_ON
>> +static inline bool tca_flags_valid(u32 act_flags)
>> +{
>> +	u32 invalid_flags_mask  = ~VALID_TCA_ROOT_FLAGS;
>> +
>> +	if (act_flags & invalid_flags_mask)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	return true;
>
> This dance should either not be here (flag-per-attr) or should be in
> netlink generic place. This is not TC specific at all.
>

So where do you think it should be?

> I would still like to see the numbers prooving we need this.
> Thanks
>

We are going to have to agree to disagree.

cheers,
jamal