netdev - Re: [PATCH] IB/IPoIB: Check the headroom size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170426144418.GB14635@dhcp-13-42.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:44:18 +0800
From:   Honggang LI <honli@...hat.com>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
        Erez Shitrit <erezsh@....mellanox.co.il>,
        Erez Shitrit <erezsh@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/IPoIB: Check the headroom size

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:25:04AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 22:11 +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:50:38AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 09:48 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 21:33 +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, it is during the process of removing the final slave. The
> > > > > reproducer looks like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > ping remote_ip_over_bonding_interface &
> > > > > while 1; do
> > > > > 	ifdown bond0
> > > > > 	ifup   bond0
> > > > > done
> > > 
> > > BTW, rerunning your test as:
> > > 
> > > ping remote_ip_over_bonding_interface &
> > > while 1; do
> > >     echo -n "Downing interface..."
> > >     ifdown bond0
> > 
> > Confirmed panic in here.
> 
> OK, this leads me to suspect that the bonding driver is possibly
> reconfiguring the skb setup to Ethernet mode before the last slave is
> fully dropped from the bond, and so the slave is seeing a packet to its
> hard header routine with the wrong headroom.  I think Paolo's patch is
> probably the best way to go.  The reason I say that is because we can't
> definitively say that this is the only pathway we will ever see that
> causes us to get a packet with Ethernet headroom on our IPoIB
> interface, and Paolo's patch gives us the possibility of recovering and
> sending the packet out.  Even in this case, we are downing the
> interface, but it isn't down entirely yet, so sending the packet out

Sending packet out over a removing interface looks bad. I'd like to drop
backlog packet.

> isn't necessarily wrong.  So a method of fix that allows us to
> recover/continue seems preferable to me.  Can you test Paolo's patch
> and see if it resolves the problem?

Yes, Paolo's patch fixes the panic issue too. But it seems has side
effort. For example:

520 struct sk_buff *arp_create(int type, int ptype, __be32 dest_ip,
.....
538                 return NULL;
539 
540         skb_reserve(skb, hlen);
541         skb_reset_network_header(skb); <-- it update skb->network_header


But skb_cow_head seems does not touch skb->network_header. I have to say
I did not test the network_header.

> 
> -- 
> Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>     GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
>    
> Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html