| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:39:32 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: ast@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bpf: add various test cases to verifier selftests
Add several test cases around ldimm64, fp arithmetic and direct
packet access.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 95a8d5f..d3395c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -191,6 +191,86 @@ struct test_val {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
+ "test6 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test7 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test8 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "uses reserved fields",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test9 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test10 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test11 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test12 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "not pointing to valid bpf_map",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "test13 ld_imm64",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
"no bpf_exit",
.insns = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
@@ -331,6 +411,30 @@ struct test_val {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
+ "invalid fp arithmetic",
+ /* If this gets ever changed, make sure JITs can deal with it. */
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, 8),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 pointer arithmetic",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "non-invalid fp arithmetic",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
"invalid argument register",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
@@ -1801,6 +1905,20 @@ struct test_val {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
+ "unpriv: adding of fp",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "pointer arithmetic prohibited",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
"unpriv: cmp of stack pointer",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -2472,6 +2590,25 @@ struct test_val {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
+ "direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 16),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid access to packet",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ },
+ {
"helper access to packet: test1, valid packet_ptr range",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists