[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9815eeb71f5507aa3f5335baf52d5c0cc7e7bdc0.1493249192.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:39:35 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: ast@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/5] bpf: provide a generic macro for percpu values for selftests
To overcome bugs as described and fixed in 89087c456fb5 ("bpf: Fix
values type used in test_maps"), provide a generic BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU()
and bpf_percpu() accessor macro for all percpu map values used in
tests.
Declaring variables works as follows (also works for structs):
BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(uint32_t, my_value);
They can then be accessed normally as uint32_t type through:
bpf_percpu(my_value, <cpu_nr>)
For example:
bpf_percpu(my_value, 0)++;
Implicitly, we make sure that the passed type is allocated and aligned
by gcc at least on a 8-byte boundary, so that it works together with
the map lookup/update syscall for percpu maps. We use it as a usage
example in test_maps, so that others are free to adapt this into their
code when necessary.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 7 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
index 7de2796..369e7d7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
@@ -54,4 +54,11 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
return possible_cpus;
}
+#define __bpf_percpu_val_align __attribute__((__aligned__(8)))
+
+#define BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(type, name) \
+ struct { type v; /* padding */ } __bpf_percpu_val_align \
+ name[bpf_num_possible_cpus()]
+#define bpf_percpu(name, cpu) name[(cpu)].v
+
#endif /* __BPF_UTIL__ */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
index a977c4f..9331452 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -137,20 +137,20 @@ static void test_hashmap_sizes(int task, void *data)
static void test_hashmap_percpu(int task, void *data)
{
unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
- long long value[nr_cpus];
+ BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, value);
long long key, next_key, first_key;
int expected_key_mask = 0;
int fd, i;
fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH, sizeof(key),
- sizeof(value[0]), 2, map_flags);
+ sizeof(bpf_percpu(value, 0)), 2, map_flags);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("Failed to create hashmap '%s'!\n", strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- value[i] = i + 100;
+ bpf_percpu(value, i) = i + 100;
key = 1;
/* Insert key=1 element. */
@@ -170,8 +170,9 @@ static void test_hashmap_percpu(int task, void *data)
/* Check that key=1 can be found. Value could be 0 if the lookup
* was run from a different CPU.
*/
- value[0] = 1;
- assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, value) == 0 && value[0] == 100);
+ bpf_percpu(value, 0) = 1;
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, value) == 0 &&
+ bpf_percpu(value, 0) == 100);
key = 2;
/* Check that key=2 is not found. */
@@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ static void test_hashmap_percpu(int task, void *data)
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &next_key, value) == 0);
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- assert(value[i] == i + 100);
+ assert(bpf_percpu(value, i) == i + 100);
key = next_key;
}
@@ -296,34 +297,36 @@ static void test_arraymap(int task, void *data)
static void test_arraymap_percpu(int task, void *data)
{
unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, values);
int key, next_key, fd, i;
- long long values[nr_cpus];
fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, sizeof(key),
- sizeof(values[0]), 2, 0);
+ sizeof(bpf_percpu(values, 0)), 2, 0);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("Failed to create arraymap '%s'!\n", strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- values[i] = i + 100;
+ bpf_percpu(values, i) = i + 100;
key = 1;
/* Insert key=1 element. */
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, values, BPF_ANY) == 0);
- values[0] = 0;
+ bpf_percpu(values, 0) = 0;
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, values, BPF_NOEXIST) == -1 &&
errno == EEXIST);
/* Check that key=1 can be found. */
- assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, values) == 0 && values[0] == 100);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, values) == 0 &&
+ bpf_percpu(values, 0) == 100);
key = 0;
/* Check that key=0 is also found and zero initialized. */
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, values) == 0 &&
- values[0] == 0 && values[nr_cpus - 1] == 0);
+ bpf_percpu(values, 0) == 0 &&
+ bpf_percpu(values, nr_cpus - 1) == 0);
/* Check that key=2 cannot be inserted due to max_entries limit. */
key = 2;
@@ -353,15 +356,15 @@ static void test_arraymap_percpu(int task, void *data)
static void test_arraymap_percpu_many_keys(void)
{
unsigned int nr_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(long, values);
/* nr_keys is not too large otherwise the test stresses percpu
* allocator more than anything else
*/
unsigned int nr_keys = 2000;
- long long values[nr_cpus];
int key, fd, i;
fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, sizeof(key),
- sizeof(values[0]), nr_keys, 0);
+ sizeof(bpf_percpu(values, 0)), nr_keys, 0);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("Failed to create per-cpu arraymap '%s'!\n",
strerror(errno));
@@ -369,19 +372,19 @@ static void test_arraymap_percpu_many_keys(void)
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- values[i] = i + 10;
+ bpf_percpu(values, i) = i + 10;
for (key = 0; key < nr_keys; key++)
assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &key, values, BPF_ANY) == 0);
for (key = 0; key < nr_keys; key++) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- values[i] = 0;
+ bpf_percpu(values, i) = 0;
assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, values) == 0);
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
- assert(values[i] == i + 10);
+ assert(bpf_percpu(values, i) == i + 10);
}
close(fd);
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists