[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002901d2be25$d9092bd0$8b1b8370$@foxmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:41:30 +0800
From: "Gao Feng" <gfree.wind@...mail.com>
To: "'Sven Eckelmann'" <sven@...fation.org>,
<b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org>
Cc: <mareklindner@...mailbox.ch>, <sw@...onwunderlich.de>,
<a@...table.cc>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Gao Feng'" <fgao@...ai8.com>
Subject: RE: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH net] net: batman-adv: Fix possible memleaks when fail to register_netdevice
> From: Sven Eckelmann [mailto:sven@...fation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 9:53 PM
> On Dienstag, 25. April 2017 20:03:20 CEST gfree.wind@...mail.com wrote:
> > From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> >
> > Because the func batadv_softif_init_late allocate some resources and
> > it would be invoked in register_netdevice. So we need to invoke the
> > func batadv_softif_free instead of free_netdev to cleanup when fail to
> > register_netdevice.
>
> I could be wrong, but shouldn't the destructor be replaced with
free_netdevice
> and the batadv_softif_free (without the free_netdev) used as ndo_uninit?
The
> line you've changed should then be kept as free_netdevice.
>
> At least this seems to be important when using rtnl_newlink() instead of
the
> legacy sysfs netdev stuff from batman-adv. rtnl_newlink() would also only
call
> free_netdevice and thus also not run batadv_softif_free. This seems to be
only
> fixable by calling ndo_uninit.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
Sorry, I don't get you.
The net_dev is created in this func batadv_softif_create.
Why couldn't invoke batadv_softif_free to cleanup when fail to
register_netdevice?
Best Regards
Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists