netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2e09d117-60f9-97ed-9f63-c94130ddbb0c@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:46:22 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

On 17-04-26 07:02 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
[..]

>> So fix iproute2. It is always first kernel, then iproute2.
>
> Perhaps I am missing the point or somehow misguided but I would expect that
> if the UAPI uses BIT() it also provides BIT().

There is a user of BIT() already in iproute2 (devlink). We can move
the code to be more generally available for other iproute2 users.
Then this UAPI change makes use of it.

cheers,
jamal