netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170426130506.GF1867@nanopsycho.orion>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:05:06 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:46:22PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On 17-04-26 07:02 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>[..]
>
>> > So fix iproute2. It is always first kernel, then iproute2.
>> 
>> Perhaps I am missing the point or somehow misguided but I would expect that
>> if the UAPI uses BIT() it also provides BIT().
>
>There is a user of BIT() already in iproute2 (devlink). We can move
>the code to be more generally available for other iproute2 users.
>Then this UAPI change makes use of it.

Should be part of UAPI as well
I see that include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h is using BIT macro.
I don't see BIT macro defined in UAPI (I thought it is). So either
define it there (not sure where) or just use "<<"