[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493266255.6453.103.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 21:10:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_rack_reo_timeout() must update
tp->tcp_mstamp
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
I wrongly assumed tp->tcp_mstamp was up to date at the time
tcp_rack_reo_timeout() was called.
It is not true, since we only update tcp->tcp_mstamp when receiving
a packet (as initially done in commit 69e996c58a35 ("tcp: add
tp->tcp_mstamp field")
tcp_rack_reo_timeout() being called by a timer and not an incoming
packet, we need to refresh tp->tcp_mstamp
Fixes: 7c1c7308592f ("tcp: do not pass timestamp to tcp_rack_detect_loss()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
index cd72b3d3879e88181c8a4639f0334a24e4cda852..362b8c75bfab44cf87c2a01398a146a271bc1119 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ void tcp_rack_reo_timeout(struct sock *sk)
u32 timeout, prior_inflight;
prior_inflight = tcp_packets_in_flight(tp);
+ skb_mstamp_get(&tp->tcp_mstamp);
tcp_rack_detect_loss(sk, &timeout);
if (prior_inflight != tcp_packets_in_flight(tp)) {
if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Recovery) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists