[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493297179.6453.105.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 05:46:19 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:55 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
> we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
> we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed,
> we just need to disable BH there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> ---
Looks great, but reading again this code, I believe we do not need to
disable BH at all ?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists