netdev - Re: [patch net-next 00/10] net: sched: introduce multichain support for filters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170428223446.GB1905@nanopsycho.orion>
Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:34:46 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/10] net: sched: introduce multichain support
 for filters

Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:40:24PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:46:03PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>>>On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>> Simple example:
>>>> $ tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
>>>> $ tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 33 flower dst_mac 52:54:00:3d:c7:6d action goto chain 11
>>>> $ tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip pref 22 chain 11 flower dst_ip 192.168.40.1 action drop
>>>> $ tc filter show dev eth0 root
>>>
>>>Interesting.
>>>
>>>I don't look into the code yet. If I understand the concepts correctly,
>>>so with your patchset we can mark either filter with a chain No. to
>>>choose which chain it belongs to _logically_ even though
>>>_physically_ it is still in the old-fashion chain (prio, proto)?
>>
>> You have to see the code :)
>
>I don't understand why I have to, these are high-level concepts
>and should be put in your cover letter (aka. design doc). You miss
>a lot of information about the ordering here.

Well, the description is one thing, but seeing the actual code should
put the whole view. But if you are missing something, I can add it. What
do you mean by "information about the ordering"?


>
>Also the terms you use are confusing too, without your patchset
>we have chains too, struct tcf_proto is a chain, each kind of filter
>defines their own way to store their filters into this chain (tp->root),
	 
Those are internal structures specific to each filter. Not "chains" per
say.

>and of course tp is chained in a singly-linked list too which turns
>into multiple-chains.