netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 08:55:40 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than
 TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch

On 17-04-28 08:21 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:46:58AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:05:06 +0200
>>

[..]
>>> Should be part of UAPI as well
>>> I see that include/uapi/rdma/vmw_pvrdma-abi.h is using BIT macro.
>>> I don't see BIT macro defined in UAPI (I thought it is). So either
>>> define it there (not sure where) or just use "<<"
>>
>> "BIT" is a pretty crazy small simple name to pollute into the global
>> namespace, IMHO.
>
> It sounds to me that it would be best to just use "<<" rather than
> spending cycles posturing on how to add it to the UAPI. Existing users
> of BIT in the UAPI could also be updated to use "<<" to avoid having
> a misleading precedence in-tree.
>

We need to convince Jiri ;-> He has plans to do a lot of cleanups and
I feel like I am pioneering (A lot of new things on my patchset).
Jiri, could this come in your cleanups later?

cheers,
jamal