lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170429095708.206dc5e7@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:57:08 +0200 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: kafai@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric@...it.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>, brouer@...hat.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V1] samples/bpf: bpf_load.c detect and abort if ELF maps section size is wrong On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:35:21 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:25:04PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > The struct bpf_map_def was extended in commit fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests > > for map-in-map") with member unsigned int inner_map_idx. This changed the size > > of the maps section in the generated ELF _kern.o files. > > > > Unfortunately the loader in bpf_load.c does not detect or handle this. Thus, > > older _kern.o files became incompatible, and caused hard-to-debug errors > > where the syscall validation rejected BPF_MAP_CREATE request. > > > > This patch only detect the situation and aborts load_bpf_file(). It also > > add code comments warning people that read this loader for inspiration > > for these pitfalls. > > > > Fixes: fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map") > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> > > Thanks! > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> Thanks! > > Is it worth to implement proper backward-compat loading of older ELF objects > > with this bpf-loader? > > probably yes, since it looks like a bunch of code in samples/bpf/ still > depend on it and some features are missing in tools/lib/bpf, > so unless we actively work on improving libbpf.a > we won't be able to get rid of this 'sample' loader for some time. Okay, I'll work on that next week. Hoping I can make the merge window, so we avoid having a non-backward compat bpf_load in a kernel release. p.s. I'll be presenting about XDP in Sweden Thur+Friday next week: https://lundlinuxcon.org/?page=current -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists