netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 binutils] Add BPF support to binutils...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170429.221315.1605574480939856975.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ast@...com
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, aconole@...heb.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 binutils] Add BPF support to binutils...

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 17:48:43 -0700

> /w/binutils-gdb/bld/binutils/objdump: invalid relocation type 10
> /w/binutils-gdb/bld/binutils/objdump: Dwarf Error: found address size

I discussed this in another email, the relocation numbers I used in
binutils do not match what is in LLVM currently.

In fact, I thought you guys weren't using relocations in any capacity
at all so just picked things from scratch :-)