[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7ttw541ohz.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:22:00 -0400
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 binutils] Add BPF support to binutils...
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> This is mainly a synchronization point, I still need to look
> more deeply into Alexei's -g issue.
>
> New in this version from v3:
> - Remove tailcall from opcode table
> - Rearrange relocations so that numbers match with LLVM ones
> - Emit relocs properly so that dwarf2 debug info tests pass
> - Handle negative load/store offsets properly, add tests
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
Latest results from x86-64 and aarch64:
Both are little endian. The only difference is for x86-64, I'm off of
commit 750eaa47f10f ("x86: Check plt_got before using .plt.got") and
for aarch64 I'm off of ee7e95efb981 ("merge_gnu_build_notes reloc
deletion"). I don't think that should matter.
I've also got a small incremental to fix some trailing whitespace, and
s/SPARC/BPF/ in one file, attached.
View attachment "0001-incremental.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3060 bytes)
x86-64:
Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/bpf/bpf.exp ...
FAIL: jump
FAIL: call
FAIL: imm64a
Running /home/aconole/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp ...
aarch64 (pine64 board):
Running /root/aarch64/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/bpf/bpf.exp ...
Running /root/aarch64/git/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists