[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170430.224426.1735697418710301007.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 22:44:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2] ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:04:29 -0700
> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
> we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
> we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed.
>
> As Eric points out, BH does not need to disable either, RCU readers
> don't care.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists