lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170430.224426.1735697418710301007.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 22:44:26 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2] ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:04:29 -0700 > After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control") > we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place > we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed. > > As Eric points out, BH does not need to disable either, RCU readers > don't care. > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists