[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1493635640-24325-2-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 12:46:28 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/53] netfilter: ipvs: don't check for presence of nat extension
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Check for the NAT status bits, they are set once conntrack needs NAT in source or
reply direction, this is slightly faster than nfct_nat() as that has to check the
extension area.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
index d30c327bb578..2e2bf7428cd1 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static int ip_vs_ftp_out(struct ip_vs_app *app, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
buf_len = strlen(buf);
ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
- if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && nfct_nat(ct)) {
+ if (ct && !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct) && (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK)) {
/* If mangling fails this function will return 0
* which will cause the packet to be dropped.
* Mangling can only fail under memory pressure,
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists