[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5907130F.7070807@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 12:50:55 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: davem@...emloft.net, johannes@...solutions.net,
dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
bblanco@...il.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kubakici@...pl,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, brouer@...hat.com, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] virtio_net: make use of extended ack message
reporting
On 05/01/2017 06:46 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Try to carry error messages to the user via the netlink extended
> ack message attribute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
[...]
> @@ -1890,16 +1891,17 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) ||
> virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
> virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) {
> - netdev_warn(dev, "can't set XDP while host is implementing LRO, disable LRO first\n");
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "can't set XDP while host is implementing LRO, disable LRO first");
Should this be NL_MOD_TRY_SET_ERR_MSG() as well like in nfp case
(otherwise the 'if (_extack)' check might be missing from the
macro)?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists