lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVmmtR8EKc2AsP2wMq8K8m_SeRSwSw4tp5u=Rt4zdzi-g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 09:33:10 -0700 From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: sock_create_kern() and (lack of) get_net() On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:39 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote: > I suspect that many of the sockets created with 'kern=1' are not 'special' > and should hold a reference to the namespace. They are special if they are created in net init, which means they have the same life-time with netns. They should NOT hold a refcnt, otherwise who would release the last netns refcnt? net exit is called when refcnt reaches 0, if you really held it, it is always at least 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists